Frequency of Solar-Like Systems and of Ice and Gas Giants Beyond the Snow Line from High-Magnification Microlensing Events in 2005-2008
A. Gould (OSU), Subo Dong (IAS), B.S. Gaudi (OSU), A. Udalski (Warsaw, U.), I.A. Bond (Massey U.), J. Greenhill (U. of Tasmania), R.A. Street, (LCOGT), M. Dominik (U. St. Andrews), T. Sumi (Nagoya U.), M.K. Szymanski, (Warsaw U.), C. Han (Chungbuk U.), MicroFUN Collaboration

TL;DR
This study measures the frequency of planets beyond the snow line using high-magnification microlensing events, revealing a higher occurrence rate than radial velocity methods and suggesting a universal distribution of planetary systems.
Contribution
First measurement of planet frequency beyond the snow line from microlensing, demonstrating a consistent distribution across different detection methods and estimating the occurrence of solar-like systems.
Findings
Planet frequency beyond snow line: (0.36+-0.15)/dex^2 at q=5e-4
Microlensing planet frequency is 7 times higher than RV studies at smaller separations
Estimated 1/6 of systems are solar-like in planetary composition
Abstract
We present the first measurement of planet frequency beyond the "snow line" for planet/star mass-ratios[-4.5<log q<-2]: d^2 N/dlog q/dlog s=(0.36+-0.15)/dex^2 at mean mass ratio q=5e-4, and consistent with being flat in log projected separation, s. Our result is based on a sample of 6 planets detected from intensive follow-up of high-mag (A>200) microlensing events during 2005-8. The sample host stars have typical mass M_host 0.5 Msun, and detection is sensitive to planets over a range of projected separations (R_E/s_max,R_E*s_max), where R_E 3.5 AU sqrt(M_host/Msun) is the Einstein radius and s_max (q/5e-5)^{2/3}, corresponding to deprojected separations ~3 times the "snow line". Though frenetic, the observations constitute a "controlled experiment", which permits measurement of absolute planet frequency. High-mag events are rare, but the high-mag channel is efficient: half of high-mag…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
