Automated classification of variable stars in the asteroseismology program of the Kepler space mission
J. Blomme, J. Debosscher, J. De Ridder, C. Aerts, R.L. Gilliland, J., Christensen-Dalsgaard, H. Kjeldsen, T.M. Brown, W.J. Borucki, D. Koch, J.M., Jenkins, D.W. Kurtz, D. Stello, I.R. Stevens, M.D. Suran, A. Derekas

TL;DR
This paper applies supervised classification methods to Kepler light curves to identify stellar variability types, discovering many new variables and highlighting the need to improve pre-launch classifications.
Contribution
It demonstrates the successful adaptation of classification techniques from CoRoT and Gaia to Kepler data, revealing new variable stars and comparing data quality across missions.
Findings
Many new variable stars discovered, including unknown eclipsing binaries.
Kepler data quality surpasses CoRoT by a factor of 2 to 2.3 in noise reduction.
Pre-launch ground-based classifications require significant improvements.
Abstract
We present the first results of the application of supervised classification methods to the Kepler Q1 long-cadence light curves of a subsample of 2288 stars measured in the asteroseismology program of the mission. The methods, originally developed in the framework of the CoRoT and Gaia space missions, are capable of identifying the most common types of stellar variability in a reliable way. Many new variables have been discovered, among which a large fraction are eclipsing/ellipsoidal binaries unknown prior to launch. A comparison is made between our classification from the Kepler data and the pre-launch class based on data from the ground, showing that the latter needs significant improvement. The noise properties of the Kepler data are compared to those of the exoplanet program of the CoRoT satellite. We find that Kepler improves on CoRoT by a factor 2 to 2.3 in point-to-point scatter.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
