Initial Characteristics of Kepler Long Cadence Data For Detecting Transiting Planets
Jon M. Jenkins, Douglas A. Caldwell, Hema Chandrasekaran, Joseph D., Twicken, Stephen T. Bryson, Elisa V. Quintana, Bruce D. Clarke, Jie Li,, Christopher Allen, Peter Tenenbaum, Hayley Wu, Todd C. Klaus, Jeffrey Van, Cleve, Jessie A. Dotson, Michael R. Haas, Ronald L. Gilliland

TL;DR
The paper evaluates Kepler's initial long cadence data, demonstrating its high photometric precision and dynamic range, which are suitable for detecting Earth-sized transiting planets and other astrophysical investigations.
Contribution
It provides an initial assessment of Kepler's photometric performance and data quality, confirming its capability to detect small transiting planets.
Findings
Photometric precision aligns with expected noise sources
High dynamic range in light curves
Systematic error correction improves data quality
Abstract
The Kepler Mission seeks to detect Earth-size planets transiting solar-like stars in its ~115 deg^2 field of view over the course of its 3.5 year primary mission by monitoring the brightness of each of ~156,000 Long Cadence stellar targets with a time resolution of 29.4 minutes. We discuss the photometric precision achieved on timescales relevant to transit detection for data obtained in the 33.5-day long Quarter 1 (Q1) observations that ended 2009 June 15. The lower envelope of the photometric precision obtained at various timescales is consistent with expected random noise sources, indicating that Kepler has the capability to fulfill its mission. The Kepler light curves exhibit high precision over a large dynamic range, which will surely permit their use for a large variety of investigations in addition to finding and characterizing planets. We discuss the temporal characteristics of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
