Instrument Performance in Kepler's First Months
Douglas A. Caldwell, Jeffery J. Kolodziejczak, Jeffrey E. Van Cleve,, Jon M. Jenkins, Paul R. Gazis, Vic S. Argabright, Eric E. Bachtell, Edward W., Dunham, John C. Geary, Ronald L. Gilliland, Hema Chandrasekaran, Jie Li,, Peter Tenenbaum, Hayley Wu, William J. Borucki

TL;DR
This paper evaluates Kepler's instrument performance during its initial commissioning, identifying systematics and confirming detector stability, to ensure the mission's goal of detecting Earth-like transits with high precision.
Contribution
It provides an early assessment of Kepler's instrument stability, identifies complex artifacts and systematics, and develops mitigation methods for high-precision photometry.
Findings
Detector properties match ground tests, indicating stability.
Complex image artifacts interact with starlight and thermal effects.
Expected to achieve planned photometric precision over most of the field.
Abstract
The Kepler Mission relies on precise differential photometry to detect the 80 parts per million (ppm) signal from an Earth-Sun equivalent transit. Such precision requires superb instrument stability on time scales up to ~2 days and systematic error removal to better than 20 ppm. To this end, the spacecraft and photometer underwent 67 days of commissioning, which included several data sets taken to characterize the photometer performance. Because Kepler has no shutter, we took a series of dark images prior to the dust cover ejection, from which we measured the bias levels, dark current, and read noise. These basic detector properties are essentially unchanged from ground-based tests, indicating that the photometer is working as expected. Several image artifacts have proven more complex than when observed during ground testing, as a result of their interactions with starlight and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
