The Cohen-Lenstra Heuristic: Methodology and Results
Johannes Lengler

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the equivalence of two probability measures in number theory and group theory, enabling the transfer of results between the Cohen-Lenstra heuristic and matrix conjugacy class studies.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence of two probability measures, bridging number theory and group theory, and provides a comprehensive survey of methods and results in both fields.
Findings
Proves the equivalence of Cohen-Lenstra measure and matrix conjugacy measure.
Enables transfer of results between number theory and group theory.
Provides a survey of existing methods and findings in both areas.
Abstract
In number theory, great efforts have been undertaken to study the Cohen-Lenstra probability measure on the set of all finite abelian -groups. On the other hand, group theorists have studied a probability measure on the set of all partitions induced by the probability that a randomly chosen -matrix over is contained in a conjucagy class associated with this partitions, for . This paper shows that both probability measures are identical. As a consequence, a multitide of results can be transferred from each theory to the other one. The paper contains a survey about the known methods to study the probability measure and about the results that have been obtained so far, from both communities.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · Advanced Operator Algebra Research
