Centrality, Rapidity and Transverse-Momentum Dependence of Cold Nuclear Matter Effects on J/Psi Production in d+Au, Cu+Cu and Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV
E. G. Ferreiro, F. Fleuret, J.P. Lansberg, A. Rakotozafindrabe

TL;DR
This study investigates cold nuclear matter effects on J/Psi production across different collision systems at 200 GeV, emphasizing the impact of kinematic assumptions on rapidity and transverse momentum distributions, and compares results with experimental data.
Contribution
It introduces an exact 2 -> 2 kinematic approach for modeling J/Psi production, revealing shifts in rapidity distributions and improving the understanding of nuclear absorption effects.
Findings
Rapidity distribution shifts with exact kinematics
Transverse momentum dependence modeled accurately
Effective nuclear absorption varies with kinematic assumptions
Abstract
We have carried out a wide study of Cold Nuclear Matter (CNM) effects on J/Psi production in d+Au, Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV. We have studied the effects of three different gluon-shadowing parametrisations, using the usual simplified kinematics for which the momentum of the gluon recoiling against the J/Psi is neglected as well as an exact kinematics for a 2 -> 2 process, namely g+g -> J/psi+g as expected from LO pQCD. We have shown that the rapidity distribution of the nuclear modification factor R_dAu, and particularly its anti-shadowing peak, is systematically shifted toward larger rapidities in the 2 -> 2 kinematics, irrespective of which shadowing parametrisation is used. In turn, we have noted differences in the effective final-state nuclear absorption necessary to fit the PHENIX d+Au data. Taking advantage of our implementation of a 2 -> 2 kinematics, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
