Technical aspects and dark matter searches
R. Bernabei (1,2), P. Belli (2), F. Cappella (3,4), R. Cerulli (5),, C.J. Dai (6), A. d'Angelo (3,4), H.L. He (6), A. Incicchitti (4), H.H. Kuang, (6), X.H. Ma (6), F. Montecchia (2,7), F. Nozzoli (1,2), D. Prosperi (3,4),, X.D. Sheng (6), Z.P. Ye (6

TL;DR
This paper discusses the technical challenges and systematic effects in dark matter direct detection experiments, emphasizing the importance of accurate simulations and handling procedures at low energies.
Contribution
It highlights the critical need for proper evaluation of systematic effects and the cautious use of Monte Carlo simulations in dark matter detection.
Findings
Systematic effects significantly impact detection sensitivity.
Monte Carlo simulations require careful validation at low energies.
Proper handling procedures are crucial for reliable results.
Abstract
A variety of detectors has been proposed for dark matter direct detection, but most of them -- by the fact -- are still at R&D stage. In many cases, it is claimed that the lack of an adequate detectors' radio-purity might be compensated through heavy uses of MonteCarlo simulations, subtractions and handlings of the measured counting rates, in order to claim higher sensitivity (just for a particular scenario). The relevance of a correct evaluation of systematic effects in the use of MonteCarlo simulations at very low energy (which has always been safely discouraged in the field so far) and of multiple subtractions and handling procedures applied to the measured counting rate is shortly addressed here at some extent. Many other aspects would also deserve suitably deep investigations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
