Interatomic forces for transition metals including magnetism
G.J. Ackland, D.J. Hepburn, J. Wallenius

TL;DR
This paper develops an extended tight-binding formalism for transition metals that incorporates magnetic interactions, enabling more accurate modeling of magnetic and non-magnetic states and linking to existing embedded atom method potentials.
Contribution
It introduces a formalism that includes magnetic interactions into the second moment tight-binding model, unifying magnetic and non-magnetic potentials within a common framework.
Findings
The formalism captures ferro- and antiferromagnetic interactions in transition metals.
It reduces to the embedded atom method for ferromagnetic cases.
Explicit temperature dependence is incorporated for antiferromagnetic and paramagnetic states.
Abstract
}We present a formalism for extending the second moment tight-binding model, incorporating ferro- and anti-ferromagn etic interaction terms which are needed for the FeCr system. For antiferromagnetic and paramagnetic materials, an explicit additional variable representing the spin is required. In a mean-field approximation this spin can be eliminated, and the potential becomes explicitly temperature dependent. For ferromagnetic interactions, this degree of freedom can be eliminated, and the formalism reduces to the embedded atom method (EAM) and we show the equivale nce of existing EAM potentials to "magnetic" potentials.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMagnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic properties of thin films · Rare-earth and actinide compounds
