Supersymmetric Extension of Hopf Maps: N=4 sigma-models and the S^3 -> S^2 Fibration
L. Faria Carvalho, Z. Kuznetsova, F. Toppan

TL;DR
This paper explores supersymmetric extensions of Hopf maps within N=4 one-dimensional sigma-models, analyzing linear and non-linear supermultiplets on spheres, and extending Schur's lemma to minimal supermultiplets up to N=8.
Contribution
It introduces supersymmetric versions of Hopf maps, compares linear and non-linear supermultiplets, and extends Schur's lemma to higher N minimal supermultiplets.
Findings
Supersymmetric extension of the S^3 -> S^2 Hopf fibration is constructed.
Non-linear supermultiplets are not equivalent to linear ones with same field content.
Schur's lemma is extended to all minimal linear supermultiplets up to N=8.
Abstract
We discuss four off-shell N=4 D=1 supersymmetry transformations, their associated one-dimensional sigma-models and their mutual relations. They are given by I) the (4,4)_{lin} linear supermultiplet (supersymmetric extension of R^4), II) the (3,4,1)_{lin} linear supermultiplet (supersymmetric extension of R^3), III) the (3,4,1)_{nl} non-linear supermultiplet living on S^3 and IV) the (2,4,2)_{nl} non-linear supermultiplet living on S^2. The I -> II map is the supersymmetric extension of the R^4 -> R^3 bilinear map, while the II -> IV map is the supersymmetric extension of the S^3 -> S^2 first Hopf fibration. The restrictions on the S^3, S^2 spheres are expressed in terms of the stereographic projections. The non-linear supermultiplets, whose supertransformations are local differential polynomials, are not equivalent to the linear supermultiplets with the same field content. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
