The enigmatic pair of dwarf galaxies Leo IV and Leo V: coincidence or common origin?
Jelte T. A. de Jong (1), Nicolas F. Martin (1), Hans-Walter Rix (1),, Kester W. Smith (1), Shoko Jin (2,3), Andrea V. Maccio' (1) ((1), Max-Planck-Institut fuer Astronomie, (2) Zentrum fuer Astronomie der, Universitaet Heidelberg, (3) Alexander von Humboldt research fellow)

TL;DR
This study reveals that the dwarf galaxies Leo IV and Leo V are larger, elongated, and possibly connected by a tidal bridge, suggesting they may be a bound pair formed through internal interaction rather than a common origin or chance encounter.
Contribution
The paper provides deep photometric analysis showing the galaxies' extended sizes, elongated shapes, and a potential tidal bridge, and evaluates their orbital dynamics to propose a bound pair scenario.
Findings
Leo IV and Leo V are larger and more elongated than previously measured.
A possible tidal bridge of extra-tidal stars connects the two galaxies.
They are unlikely to be remnants of a single progenitor or a chance collision, but could be a bound pair.
Abstract
We have obtained deep photometry in two 1x1 degree fields covering the close pair of dwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSph) Leo IV and Leo V and part of the area in between. We find that both systems are significantly larger than indicated by previous measurements based on shallower data and also significantly elongated. With half-light radii of r_h=4'.6 +- 0'.8 (206 +- 36 pc) and r_h=2'.6 +- 0'.6 (133 +- 31 pc), respectively, they are now well within the physical size bracket of typical Milky Way dSph satellites. Their ellipticities of epsilon ~0.5 are shared by many faint (M_V>-8) Milky Way dSphs. The large spatial extent of our survey allows us to search for extra-tidal features with unprecedented sensitivity. The spatial distribution of candidate red giant branch and horizontal branch stars is found to be non-uniform at the ~3 sigma level. This substructure is aligned along the direction…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
