Testing Local Lorentz and Position Invariance and Variation of Fundamental Constants by searching the Derivative of the Comparison Frequency Between a Cryogenic Sapphire Oscillator and Hydrogen Maser
Michael Edmund Tobar, Peter Wolf, Sebastien Bize, Giorgio Santarelli,, Victor Flambaum

TL;DR
This study uses over six years of data comparing a cryogenic sapphire oscillator and hydrogen masers to test local Lorentz invariance, gravitational potential effects, and fundamental constant variations with unprecedented precision.
Contribution
It introduces a novel analysis method based on the derivative of the comparison frequency, achieving significantly improved limits on Lorentz invariance violations and fundamental constant variations.
Findings
Improved bounds on sidereal and annual Lorentz invariance violations.
Enhanced constraints on gravitational potential effects on fundamental constants.
First limits on boost dependence of fundamental constants.
Abstract
The cryogenic sapphire oscillator (CSO) at the Paris Observatory has been continuously compared to various Hydrogen Masers since 2001. The early data sets were used to test Local Lorentz Invariance in the Robertson-Mansouri-Sexl (RMS) framework by searching for sidereal modulations with respect to the Cosmic Microwave Background, and represent the best Kennedy-Thorndike experiment to date. In this work we present continuous operation over a period of greater than six years from September 2002 to December 2008 and present a more precise way to analyze the data by searching the time derivative of the comparison frequency. Due to the long-term operation we are able to search both sidereal and annual modulations. The results gives P_{KT} = \beta_{RMS}-\alpha_{RMS}-1 = -1.7(4.0) \times 10^{-8} for the sidereal and -23(10) \times 10^{-8} for the annual term, with a weighted mean of -4.8(3.7)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
