Cluster Galaxies Die Hard
Simone M. Weinmann, Guinevere Kauffmann, Anja von der Linden,, Gabriella De Lucia

TL;DR
This paper examines how galaxy star formation rates vary with environment and compares observations to semi-analytic models, identifying discrepancies and proposing modifications to improve model accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces specific model adjustments, including gradual gas stripping and modified AGN feedback, to better match observed galaxy properties in clusters.
Findings
Models overpredict passive satellites in clusters.
Models underpredict passive low-mass centrals.
Proposed modifications improve model-data agreement.
Abstract
We investigate how the specific star formation rates of galaxies of different masses depend on cluster-centric radius and on the central/satellite dichotomy in both field and cluster environments. Recent data from a variety of sources, including the cluster catalogue of von der Linden et al. are compared to the semi-analytic models of De Lucia & Blaizot. We find that these models predict too many passive satellite galaxies in clusters, too few passive central galaxies with low stellar masses, and too many passive central galaxies with high masses. We then outline a series of modifications to the model necessary to solve these problems: a) Instead of instantaneous stripping of the external gas reservoir after a galaxy becomes a satellite, the gas supply is assumed to decrease at the same rate that the surrounding halo loses mass due to tidal stripping, b) The AGN feedback efficiency is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
