Features in the primordial power spectrum? A frequentist analysis
Jan Hamann, Arman Shafieloo, Tarun Souradeep

TL;DR
This paper uses a frequentist statistical approach to assess whether observed features in the primordial power spectrum are statistically significant or likely due to noise, concluding that the data are consistent with a featureless spectrum.
Contribution
It introduces a Monte-Carlo based frequentist method to evaluate the significance of primordial spectrum features in CMB data.
Findings
26% of simulated datasets show greater likelihood improvement than actual data
Features in the spectrum are not statistically significant
WMAP data are consistent with a featureless power-law spectrum
Abstract
Features in the primordial power spectrum have been suggested as an explanation for glitches in the angular power spectrum of temperature anisotropies measured by the WMAP satellite. However, these glitches might just as well be artifacts of noise or cosmic variance. Using the effective Delta chi^2 between the best-fit power-law spectrum and a deconvolved primordial spectrum as a measure of "featureness" of the data, we perform a full Monte-Carlo analysis to address the question of how significant the recovered features are. We find that in 26% of the simulated data sets the reconstructed spectrum yields a greater improvement in the likelihood than for the actually observed data. While features cannot be categorically ruled out by this analysis, and the possibility remains that simple theoretical models which predict some of the observed features might stand up to rigorous statistical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
