SHELS: Testing Weak Lensing Maps with Redshift Surveys
Margaret J. Geller, Michael J. Kurtz, Ian P. Dell'Antonio, Massimo, Ramella, Daniel G. Fabricant

TL;DR
This study assesses the effectiveness of weak lensing maps in detecting galaxy clusters by combining a dense redshift survey with lensing data, revealing limitations and the need for multi-method approaches.
Contribution
It provides a detailed evaluation of weak lensing detection efficiency and completeness using the SHELS redshift survey and DLS lensing map, highlighting detection challenges.
Findings
Only 4 of 12 high signal-to-noise peaks correspond to massive clusters.
Approximately 50% of known massive clusters are detected in weak lensing maps.
Some known clusters are undetected or only detectable with additional structure.
Abstract
Weak lensing surveys are emerging as an important tool for the construction of "mass selected" clusters of galaxies. We evaluate both the efficiency and completeness of a weak lensing selection by combining a dense, complete redshift survey, the Smithsonian Hectospec Lensing Survey (SHELS), with a weak lensing map from the Deep Lens Survey (DLS). SHELS includes 11,692 redshifts for galaxies with R < 20.6 in the four square degree DLS field; the survey is a solid basis for identifying massive clusters of galaxies with redshift z < 0.55. The range of sensitivity of the redshift survey is similar to the range for the DLS convergence map. Only four the twelve convergence peaks with signal-to-noise > 3.5 correspond to clusters of galaxies with M > 1.7 x 10^14 solar masses. Four of the eight massive clusters in SHELS are detected in the weak lensing map yielding a completeness of roughly 50%.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
