Reply to Itin, Obukhov and Hehl paper "An Electric Charge has no Screw Sense - A Comment on the Twist-Free Formulation of Electrodynamics by da Rocha & Rodrigues"
Roldao da Rocha, Waldyr A. Rodrigues Jr

TL;DR
This paper defends a previous electrodynamics formulation against criticism, clarifies misunderstandings, and provides new comments to reinforce its approach, emphasizing its validity and relevance.
Contribution
It offers a rebuttal to critiques of a specific electrodynamics formulation and clarifies its theoretical stance with additional insights.
Findings
Criticisms are ill conceived or irrelevant.
The original formulation remains valid and well-founded.
Additional comments reinforce the approach's robustness.
Abstract
In this note we briefly comment a paper by Itin, Obukhov and Hehl criticising our previous paper. We show that all remarks by our critics are ill conceived or irrelevant to our approach and moreover we provide some pertinent new comments to their critical paper, with the aim to clarify even more our view on the subject.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
