Completeness of the WDS method in Checking Positivity of Integral Forms
Xiaorong Hou, Junwei Shao

TL;DR
This paper establishes the completeness of the WDS method for verifying the positivity of integral forms by providing upper bounds on the number of steps needed for positive definiteness or semidefiniteness proofs.
Contribution
It introduces upper bounds on WDS steps, demonstrating the method's completeness for checking positivity of integral forms.
Findings
Upper bounds for WDS steps in positivity proofs
WDS method is complete for integral forms
Applicable to positive definite and semidefinite forms
Abstract
Examples show that integral forms can be efficiently proved positive semidefinite by the WDS method, but it was unknown that how many steps of substitutions are needed, or furthermore, which integral forms is this method applicable for. In this paper, we give upper bounds of step numbers of WDS required in proving that an integral form is positive definite, positive semidefinite, or not positive semidefinite, thus deducing that the WDS method is complete.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPolynomial and algebraic computation · Numerical Methods and Algorithms · Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
