The Sato-Tate conjecture for Hilbert modular forms
Thomas Barnet-Lamb, Toby Gee, David Geraghty

TL;DR
This paper proves the Sato-Tate conjecture for Hilbert modular forms over totally real fields, extending previous results and introducing new automorphy lifting techniques that do not rely on potential automorphy theorems for non-ordinary Galois representations.
Contribution
It provides a new proof of the Sato-Tate conjecture for modular forms using automorphy lifting over ramified fields, avoiding previous reliance on potential automorphy theorems.
Findings
Proves the Sato-Tate conjecture for regular algebraic cuspidal automorphic representations of GL(2) over totally real fields.
Develops automorphy lifting theorems over ramified fields with a topological argument.
Offers a new proof for the conjecture in the classical modular form case without potential automorphy theorems.
Abstract
We prove the Sato-Tate conjecture for Hilbert modular forms. More precisely, we prove the natural generalisation of the Sato-Tate conjecture for regular algebraic cuspidal automorphic representations of , a totally real field, which are not of CM type. The argument is based on the potential automorphy techniques developed by Taylor et. al., but makes use of automorphy lifting theorems over ramified fields, together with a 'topological' argument with local deformation rings. In particular, we give a new proof of the conjecture for modular forms, which does not make use of potential automorphy theorems for non-ordinary -dimensional Galois representations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
