Supersoft sources in M 31: Comparing the XMM-Newton Deep Survey, ROSAT and Chandra catalogues
H. Stiele, W. Pietsch, F. Haberl, V. Burwitz, D. Hatzidimitriou, J., Greiner

TL;DR
This study compares supersoft X-ray sources in M 31 across XMM-Newton, ROSAT, and Chandra surveys, revealing their high variability, transient nature, and association with optical novae over a decade.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of SSSs across multiple X-ray surveys, highlighting their transient behavior and long-term visibility in M 31.
Findings
Most SSSs are highly variable and transient.
Only three sources are consistently detected across all three missions.
Many SSSs are associated with optical novae.
Abstract
To investigate the transient nature of supersoft sources (SSSs) in M 31, we compared SSS candidates of the XMM-Newton Deep Survey, ROSAT PSPC surveys and the Chandra catalogues in the same field. We found 40 SSSs in the XMM-Newton observations. While 12 of the XMM-Newton sources were brighter than the limiting flux of the ROSAT PSPC survey, only two were detected with ROSAT ~10 yr earlier. Five correlate with recent optical novae which explains why they were not detected by ROSAT. The remaining 28 XMM-Newton SSSs have fluxes below the ROSAT detection threshold. Nevertheless we found one correlation with a ROSAT source, which had significantly larger fluxes than during the XMM-Newton observations. Ten of the XMM-Newton SSSs were detected by Chandra with <1-~6 yr between the observations. Five were also classified as SSSs by Chandra. Of the 30 ROSAT SSSs three were confirmed with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
