Chasing the heaviest black holes of jetted Active Galactic Nuclei
G. Ghisellini (1), R. Della Ceca (1), M. Volonteri (2), G. Ghirlanda, (1), F. Tavecchio (1), L. Foschini (1), G. Tagliaferri (1), F. Haardt (3), G., Pareschi (1), J. Grindlay (4) ((1) INAF-OABrera, Italy, (2) Michigan Univ.,, USA, (3) Insubria Univ., Italy, (4) CfA, USA)

TL;DR
This paper studies the most powerful high-redshift blazars with massive black holes and strong jets, highlighting their detectability in hard X-ray surveys and implications for future missions.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of high-redshift BAT-detected blazars with LAT blazars, emphasizing their extreme properties and detection prospects in hard X-ray bands.
Findings
BAT blazars have more powerful jets than LAT blazars.
Black hole masses in these blazars exceed billions of solar masses.
Hard X-ray surveys are more effective for detecting the most extreme blazars.
Abstract
We investigate the physical properties of the 10 blazars at redshift greater than 2 detected in the 3-years all sky survey performed by the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) onboard the Swift satellite. We find that the jets of these blazars are among the most powerful known. Furthermore, the mass of their central black hole, inferred from the optical-UV bump, exceeds a few billions of solar masses, with accretion luminosities being a large fraction of the Eddington one. We compare their properties with those of the brightest blazars of the 3-months survey performed by the Large Area Telescope (LAT) onboard the Fermi satellite. We find that the BAT blazars have more powerful jets, more luminous accretion disks and larger black hole masses than LAT blazars. These findings can be simply understood on the basis of the blazar sequence, that suggests that the most powerful blazars have a spectral…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
