Testing axioms for Quantum Mechanics on Probabilistic toy-theories
Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano, Alessandro Tosini

TL;DR
This paper evaluates several proposed axioms for quantum mechanics against nonquantum probabilistic models, revealing which models satisfy or violate these axioms and exploring their implications for nonlocality and teleportation.
Contribution
It systematically tests key quantum axioms on diverse probabilistic models, highlighting their limitations and connections to nonlocal phenomena.
Findings
The two-box world model violates some postulates, indicating limits of axioms.
The two-clock world models show varied compliance, illustrating the role of state space geometry.
Classical theory violates certain quantum postulates, emphasizing differences between classical and quantum structures.
Abstract
In Ref. [1] one of the authors proposed postulates for axiomatizing Quantum Mechanics as a "fair operational framework", namely regarding the theory as a set of rules that allow the experimenter to predict future events on the basis of suitable tests, having local control and low experimental complexity. In addition to causality, the following postulates have been considered: PFAITH (existence of a pure preparationally faithful state), and FAITHE (existence of a faithful effect). These postulates have exhibited an unexpected theoretical power, excluding all known nonquantum probabilistic theories. Later in Ref. [2] in addition to causality and PFAITH, postulate LDISCR (local discriminability) and PURIFY (purifiability of all states) have been considered, narrowing the probabilistic theory to something very close to Quantum Mechanics. In the present paper we test the above postulates on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
