Bayesian analysis of caustic-crossing microlensing events
A. Cassan (Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, Universite Pierre et, Marie Curie), K. Horne (University of St Andrews), N. Kains (University of St, Andrews), Y. Tsapras (LCOGT, Queen Mary University of London), P. Browne, (University of St Andrews)

TL;DR
This paper enhances Bayesian modeling techniques for caustic-crossing microlensing events, improving the efficiency and physical plausibility of binary-lens event analysis, which is crucial for exoplanet detection.
Contribution
It introduces a method to incorporate Bayesian priors into Cassan's parameter framework, enabling faster and more physically consistent microlensing model fitting.
Findings
Bayesian priors reduce fitting time by excluding implausible models.
The method improves discrimination between competing models.
Implementation in MCMC algorithms enhances robustness of analysis.
Abstract
Aims: Caustic-crossing binary-lens microlensing events are important anomalous events because they are capable of detecting an extrasolar planet companion orbiting the lens star. Fast and robust modelling methods are thus of prime interest in helping to decide whether a planet is detected by an event. Cassan (2008) introduced a new set of parameters to model binary-lens events, which are closely related to properties of the light curve. In this work, we explain how Bayesian priors can be added to this framework, and investigate on interesting options. Methods: We develop a mathematical formulation that allows us to compute analytically the priors on the new parameters, given some previous knowledge about other physical quantities. We explicitly compute the priors for a number of interesting cases, and show how this can be implemented in a fully Bayesian, Markov chain Monte Carlo…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
