Are black holes big enough to quench cooling in cluster cool cores?
M. Ruszkowski (1) ((1) University of Michigan in Ann Arbor)

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether supermassive black holes in brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) are massive enough to counteract cooling in cluster cores, using high-resolution cosmological simulations to analyze their growth and scaling relations.
Contribution
The study provides new simulation-based evidence that black holes in BCGs may be more massive than predicted by the standard M-sigma relation, due to galaxy merger effects.
Findings
BCGs deviate from the size-luminosity relation, indicating growth through mergers.
Luminosity-sigma relation bends for BCGs, affecting black hole mass predictions.
Results support that black holes in BCGs are more massive than standard models suggest.
Abstract
Total energy arguments (e.g., Fabian et al. 2002) suggest that black holes need to have masses significantly in excess of the prediction from the classic black hole mass - velocity dispersion relation (M-sigma) in order to offset the cooling losses in massive cool core clusters. This suggests that the black holes may be too small to power such clusters. However, Lauer et al. (2007) argue that the black hole mass - bulge luminosity relationship is a better predictor of black hole masses in high luminosity galaxies and that this relationship predicts significantly higher masses in BCGs. They find slow increase in the velocity dispersion with luminosity and a more rapid increase in effective radii with luminosity seen in BCGs as opposed to less luminous galaxies. Motivated by these results and the theoretical work of Boylan-Kolchin et al. (2006) on isolated mergers, we perform…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Are black holes big enough to quench cooling
in cluster cool cores?
Mateusz Ruszkowski
Abstract
Total energy arguments (e.g., Fabian et al. 2002) suggest that black holes need to have masses significantly in excess of the prediction from the classic relation in order to offset the cooling losses in massive cool core clusters. This suggests that the black holes may be too small to ”power” such clusters. However, Lauer et al. (2007) argue that the relationship is a better predictor of black hole masses in high luminosity galaxies and that this relationship predicts significantly higher masses in BCGs. They find slow increase in with and a more rapid increase in effective radii with seen in BCGs as opposed to less luminous galaxies. Motivated by these results and the theoretical work of Boylan-Kolchin et al. (2006) on isolated mergers, we perform high-resolution cosmological simulations of dry mergers in a massive galaxy cluster identified in the Millennium Run including both the dark matter halos and stellar bulges of merging galaxies. We demonstrate that the BCG clearly evolves away from the size-luminosity relation as defined by the smaller galaxies (i.e., the relation bends) and we also see a bending in the relation. As is expected to be proportional to the mass and luminosity of the stellar bulge of the BCGs (if they were formed in predominantly dissipationless mergers), our findings are consistent with those of Lauer et al. (2007) on a qualitative level and suggest that the black holes in BCGs may indeed be more massive than predicted from the standard relation.
Keywords:
brightest cluster galaxies, black holes, cool cores
:
98.65.Cw, 98.65.Fz, 98.65.Hb, 98.70.Dk
1 Introduction
The brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) are special. They are the most massive and luminous galaxies in the universe. They are typically located in the very centers of clusters of galaxies which indicate that their formation is closely linked to that of the clusters themselves. Their formation history is therefore distinct from typical elliptical galaxies. Recent analysis by Best2007 shows that BCGs are also more likely to host active galactic nuclei (AGNs) than other galaxies of the same stellar mass. This indicates that the supermassive black holes hosted by these objects play a pivotal role in quenching cooling flows and star formation in clusters.
2 Black hole masses and heating of cool cores
BCGs have been recently shown to lie off the standard scaling relations of early-type galaxies (e.g., Lauer2007 ). In particular, they show excess luminosity (or stellar mass) above the prediction of the standard Faber-Jackson relation at high galaxy masses. This hints at the interesting possibility that their black hole masses may be larger than estimated from the relation. It has been demonstrated that the amount of star formation in BCGs is comparatively low (e.g., O’Dea, these proceedings; Hicks, these proceedings). Under such conditions mergers between the BCG and other massive ellipticals should preserve the ratio between the stellar mass of the merger remnant and the final mass of its central supermassive black hole. Therefore, any observed departure from the standard slope of the relation should translate into bending in the relation.
It has been recognized that simple arguments based on the overall balance of the energy supplied by AGN and the energy lost to radiative cooling in cool cores over cluster lifetime imply that the masses of the central black holes should be larger then expected from the standard relation (Fabian2002 ; Fujita2004 ). More specifically, assuming standard efficiency of 10% of conversion of accreted mass to energy, the masses of black holes in the hottest clusters would have to exceed . Alternatively, the efficiencies of these black holes would have to appreciably exceed 10%.
Motivated by the observational findings of Lauer2007 and theoretical work of Boylan-Kolchin2006 on the effect of isolated dry mergers on scaling relations, we performed cosmological simulations of the formation of brightest cluster galaxies. The details of the methodology can be found in Ruszkowski2009 . In brief, we identified a very massive cluster in the Millennium Run and traced it back to . The initial conditions in the corresponding region were refined beyond the Millennium Run resolution and the simulation was evolved to . At this redshift we replaced the most massive halos in a protocluster by galaxy models consisting of dark matter and stars. We then evolved the cluster to . This approach enabled us to include numerous galaxy mergers in a self-consistent fashion while also taking into account the effect of the cluster potential on the properties of the forming BCG.
3 Results
Figure 1 (left panel) shows the evolution of the relation between the half-light radius and the stellar mass within that radius. This relation is similar to the Kormendy relation. The initial () and final () models are represented by the red and black points, respectively. Intermediate redshifts are marked by open circles with colors as given in the inset. The figure demonstrates that, while smaller mass galaxies show relatively little evolution, the BCG clearly gains a substantial amount of mass and increases in size. Interestingly, it clearly evolves off the extrapolation of the initial radius-mass relation. This effect has been reported in the observational work of Lauer2007 . This “puffing-up” effect is driven by a large number of mergers that the BCG experiences during the formation process. Figure 2 (middle panel) demonstrates that the BCG does indeed experience many more mergers than any other galaxy in the cluster. Consequently, these mergers tend to mix the stars, that are more centrally located, with the dark matter which, in turn, leads to the increase in the half-light radius of the BCG. A direct consequence of this mixing process is the increase in the mass-to-light ratio for the BCG (i.e., the BCG becomes much “darker” for a given stellar mass). This is shown in the right panel in Figure 1.
Black hole mass bias in BCGs Merging of the central BCG with cluster galaxies tends to occur on more elongated, lower angular momentum orbits then in the case of the mergers between field galaxies. Galaxies on lower angular momentum orbits need to lose less angular momentum to complete the merger. Consequently, the merger remnant is more extended compared to the size of the remnant resulting from a merger of galaxies on high angular momentum orbit (see Figure 2). Now, the size of the merger remnant affects its final velocity dispersion. That is, more extended remnants have relatively lower velocity dispersions. This means that the BCGs, that form as a result of mergers with galaxies on orbits that are biased toward low angular momentum (i.e., more “radial” mergers), tend to be more extended and, consequently, have somewhat lower velocity dispersions then they would have if the mergers were not “radially-biased”. In other words, the BCG lies somewhat above the extrapolated Faber-Jackson relation defined by other (less massive) massive ellipticals in the cluster. Figure 3 shows the ratio between the simulated Faber-Jackson relation and its equivalent defined by other ellipticals belonging to the cluster. This figure clearly demonstrates that the BCG departs from the extrapolated trend. As the final assembly of the BCG is likely dominated by dissipationless mergers, any bend in the Faber-Jackson relation can be translated into the bend in the (log-log) relation between the mass in the stellar component and its velocity dispersion. If indeed the mergers are predominantly dry, then the mass ratio between the stellar component and the central supermassive black hole should be preserved. Since the stellar mass of the BCG for a given velocity dispersion is boosted, so should be the masses of the supermassive black holes in its center. If so, this mechanism would be one way to reconcile the total energy requirements in cool cores with the amount of heating supplied by the central AGN.
M.R. thanks V. Springel (co-author of the paper on which these proceedings are based), A. von der Linden, Monica Valluri, Marta Volonteri, M. Boylan-Kolchin, M. Dotti, O. Moeller, E. Bell, A. Romanowsky, and S. White for many stimulating discussions.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1(1) Best, P. N. et al. 2007, MNRAS , 379, 894
- 2(2) Boylan-Kolchin, M., Ma, C.-P., & Quataert, E. 2006, MNRAS , 369, 1081
- 3(3) Fabian, A. C., Voigt, L. M., & Morris, R. G. 2002, MNRAS , 335, L 71
- 4(4) Fujita, Y., & Reiprich, T. H. 2004, MNRAS , 612, 797
- 5(5) Lauer, T. R., et al. 2007, Ap J , 662, 808
- 6(6) Ruszkowski, M., & Springel, V. 2009, Ap J , 696, 1094
