The Linearity of the Cosmic Expansion Field from 300 to 30,000 km/s and the Bulk Motion of the Local Supercluster with Respect to the CMB
A. Sandage (1), B. Reindl (2), G.A. Tammann (2) ((1) Observatories, Carnegie Inst. Washington, (2) Department of Physics, Astronomy, Univ. of, Basel)

TL;DR
This study confirms the linearity of cosmic expansion from 300 to 30,000 km/s using precise distance measurements, and analyzes the Local Supercluster's motion relative to the CMB, finding it consistent with gravitational influences.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the linearity of cosmic expansion over a large velocity range and refutes the existence of a proposed Hubble Bubble at high confidence.
Findings
Cosmic expansion is linear within 2.3% over the studied velocity range.
The Local Supercluster moves at 448 km/s towards the CMB pole.
No evidence supports the proposed Hubble Bubble at 4 sigma confidence.
Abstract
The meaning of "linear expansion" is explained. Particularly accurate relative distances are compiled and homogenized a) for 246 SNe Ia and 35 clusters with v<30,000 km/s, and b) for relatively nearby galaxies with 176 TRGB and 30 Cepheid distances. The 487 objects define a tight Hubble diagram from 300-30,000 km/s implying individual distance errors of <7.5%. Here the velocities are corrected for Virgocentric steaming (locally 220 km/s) and - if v_220>3500 km/s - for a 495 km/s motion of the Local Supercluster towards the warm CMB pole at l=275, b=12; local peculiar motions are averaged out by large numbers. A test for linear expansion shows that the corrected velocities increase with distance as predicted by a standard model with q_0=-0.55 [corresponding to (Omega_M, Omega_Lambda)=(0.3,0.7)], but the same holds - due to the distance limitation of the present sample - for a range of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
