Relativistic beaming and gamma-ray brightness of blazars
T. Savolainen (MPIfR), D. C. Homan (Denison U.), T. Hovatta (Purdue, U.; TKK), M. Kadler (Bamberg; Erlangen; CRESST/NASA GSFC; USRA), Y. Y., Kovalev (ASC Lebedev; MPIfR), M. L. Lister (Purdue U.), E. Ros (MPIfR; U., Valencia), J. A. Zensus (MPIfR)

TL;DR
This study examines how relativistic beaming influences the gamma-ray brightness of blazars by analyzing jet properties and viewing angles, revealing that gamma-ray bright blazars tend to have higher Doppler factors and specific viewing angle distributions.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis linking gamma-ray brightness of blazars to their jet Lorentz factors and viewing angles using VLBA and Fermi data.
Findings
Gamma-ray bright blazars have higher Doppler factors.
Gamma-ray bright blazars have narrower viewing angle distributions.
Lack of gamma-ray bright blazars at large comoving angles explained by beaming.
Abstract
We investigate the dependence of gamma-ray brightness of blazars on intrinsic properties of their parsec-scale radio jets and the implication for relativistic beaming. By combining apparent jet speeds derived from high-resolution VLBA images from the MOJAVE program with millimetre-wavelength flux density monitoring data from Metsahovi Radio Observatory, we estimate the jet Doppler factors, Lorentz factors, and viewing angles for a sample of 62 blazars. We study the trends in these quantities between the sources which were detected in gamma-rays by the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) during its first three months of science operations and those which were not detected. The LAT-detected blazars have on average higher Doppler factors than non-LAT-detected blazars, as has been implied indirectly in several earlier studies. We find statistically significant differences in the viewing angle…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
