Comparing Hbeta Line Profiles in the 4D Eigenvector 1 Context
J. W. Sulentic (1), P. Marziani (2), S. Zamfir (3) ((1) Instituto, de Astrofisica de Andalucia, Granada, Spain; (2) INAF, Osservatorio, Astronomico di Padova, Italy; (3) University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa)

TL;DR
This paper introduces the 4D Eigenvector 1 space as a unifying framework for quasar spectra, revealing a potential dichotomy in H_beta line profiles that impacts black hole mass estimates and source structure understanding.
Contribution
It presents the 4DE1 space as a new classification scheme for quasars, highlighting a fundamental dichotomy in H_beta line profiles between two populations.
Findings
Quasars with FWHM H_beta < 4000 km/s (Pop. A) show Lorentzian profiles.
Quasars with FWHM H_beta > 4000 km/s (Pop. B) show double Gaussian profiles.
The dichotomy affects black hole mass estimation and source kinematics.
Abstract
We describe a 4D Eigenvector 1 (4DE1) space that serves as a surrogate H-R diagram for quasars. It provides a context for describing and unifying differences between all broad line AGN. Quasar spectra can be averaged in a non-random way using 4DE1 just as stellar spectra can be averaged non-randomly within the OBAFGKM classification sequence. We find that quasars with FWHM H_beta less than (Population A) and greater than (Population B) 4000 km/s show many significant differences that may point to an actual dichotomy. Broad line profile measures and fits reenforce the idea of a dichotomy because they are fundamentally different: Pop.A - Lorentzian-like and Pop.B - double Gaussian. The differences have implications both for BH mass estimation and for inferences about source structure and kinematics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
