Comment on "Matrix Pencils and Entanglement Classification"
Eric Chitambar, Carl A. Miller, Yaoyun Shi

TL;DR
This paper extends a polynomial-time algorithm to enumerate all SLOCC equivalence classes in 2⊗m⊗n quantum systems, using matrix pencil canonical forms, and provides explicit representatives for classes in 2⊗3⊗n systems.
Contribution
It introduces a straightforward modification of an existing algorithm to classify all SLOCC equivalence classes via Kronecker canonical forms in the specified quantum systems.
Findings
Enumeration of all SLOCC classes in 2⊗m⊗n systems.
Explicit representatives for each class in 2⊗3⊗n systems.
Algorithmic approach based on matrix pencil canonical forms.
Abstract
In our earlier posting "Matrix Pencils and Entanglement Classification", arXiv:0911.1803, we gave a polynomial-time algorithm for deciding if two states in a space of dimension are SLOCC equivalent. In this note, we point out that a straightforward modification of the algorithm gives a simple enumeration of all SLOCC equivalence classes in the same space, with the class representatives expressed in the Kronecker canonical normal form of matrix pencils. Thus, two states are equivalent if and only if they have the same canonical form. As an example, we present representatives in canonical form for each of the 26 equivalence classes in systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum many-body systems
