Effets d'une suppl\'eance perceptive visuelle, auditive et tactile sur le contr\^ole des pressions fessi\`eres en position assise
Olivier Chenu (TIMC), R\'emy Cuisinier (TIMC), Nicolas Pinsault, (TIMC), Jacques Demongeot (TIMC), Yohan Payan (TIMC), Nicolas Vuillerme, (TIMC)

TL;DR
This study compares visual, audio, and tactile feedback modalities in a device designed to reduce pressure on the buttocks, finding all modalities effective but differing in comfort and disturbance levels.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of visual, audio, and tactile perceptual supplementation modalities for pressure reduction in seated positions.
Findings
All modalities effectively reduce overpressure.
Modalities are perceived as equally effective.
Comfort and disturbance levels vary among modalities.
Abstract
This article presents a study on different informative modalities of a perceptual supplementation device aiming at reducing overpressure at the buttock area. Visual, audio and tactile modalities are analysed and compared with a non-biofeedback session. In conclusion, modalities have a positive and equal effect, but they are not equally judged in term of comfort and disturbance with some other activities
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
