Non-equilibrium Fluctuation Relations in a Quantum Coherent Conductor
Shuji Nakamura, Yoshiaki Yamauchi, Masayuki Hashisaka, Kensaku Chida,, Kensuke Kobayashi, Teruo Ono, Renaud Leturcq, Klaus Ensslin, Keiji Saito,, Yasuhiro Utsumi, Arthur C. Gossard

TL;DR
This paper experimentally validates non-equilibrium fluctuation relations in a quantum coherent conductor, confirming theoretical predictions and extending understanding of fluctuation theorems beyond classical regimes.
Contribution
First experimental demonstration of non-equilibrium fluctuation relations in a quantum coherent conductor, confirming theoretical predictions in the quantum non-linear regime.
Findings
Fluctuation theorem holds in quantum conductors under non-equilibrium conditions.
Non-equilibrium fluctuation relations are validated even when Onsager-Casmir relations are broken.
Higher order correlations between current and noise are derived from the fluctuation theorem.
Abstract
We experimentally demonstrate the validity of non-equilibrium fluctuation relations by using a quantum coherent conductor. In equilibrium the fluctuation-dissipation relation leads to the correlation between current and current noise at the conductor, namely, Johnson-Nyqusit relation. When the conductor is voltage-biased so that the non-linear regime is entered, the fluctuation theorem has predicted similar non-equilibrium fluctuation relations, which hold true even when the Onsager-Casmir relations are broken in magnetic fields. Our experiments qualitatively validate the predictions as the first evidence of this theorem in the non-equilibrium quantum regime. In the appendix, we give simple deduction of the higher order correlations between the current and the current noise based on the fluctuation theorem.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
