Neutron scattering study of the high energy graphitic phonons in superconducting CaC$_6$
M. P. M. Dean, A. C. Walters, C. A. Howard, T. E. Weller, M. Calandra,, F. Mauri, M. Ellerby, S. S. Saxena, A. Ivanov, D. F. McMorrow

TL;DR
This neutron scattering study investigates high-energy phonons in superconducting CaC$_6$, comparing experimental data with DFT calculations to clarify lattice dynamics and address previous discrepancies in the literature.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed experimental and theoretical analysis of phonon modes in CaC$_6$, highlighting the accuracy of DFT in describing lattice dynamics in this superconductor.
Findings
DFT accurately describes general phonon features in CaC$_6$
Experimental data show good agreement with theoretical predictions
Discrepancies in previous studies are not due to phonon frequency inaccuracies
Abstract
We present the results of a neutron scattering study of the high energy phonons in the superconducting graphite intercalation compound CaC. The study was designed to address hitherto unexplored aspects of the lattice dynamics in CaC, and in particular any renormalization of the out-of-plane and in-plane graphitic phonon modes. We present a detailed comparison between the data and the results of density functional theory (DFT). A description is given of the analysis methods developed to account for the highly-textured nature of the samples. The DFT calculations are shown to provide a good description of the general features of the experimental data. This is significant in light of a number of striking disagreements in the literature between other experiments and DFT on CaC. The results presented here demonstrate that the disagreements are not due to any large inaccuracies in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
