LoCuSS: First Results from Strong-lensing Analysis of 20 Massive Galaxy Clusters at z~0.2
Johan Richard (Durham), Graham P. Smith (Birmingham), Jean-Paul Kneib, (Marseille), Richard Ellis (Caltech), Alastair J. R. Sanderson (Birmingham),, Liuyi Pei (Caltech), Thomas Targett (UBC), David Sand (Harvard), Mark, Swinbank (Durham), Helmut Dannerbauer (Heidelberg)

TL;DR
This study analyzes 20 galaxy clusters using strong lensing and X-ray data to understand their mass distribution, substructure, and the impact of mergers, providing insights into cluster physics and dark matter models.
Contribution
First detailed strong lensing analysis of 20 clusters at z~0.2, revealing correlations between substructure, mass discrepancies, and gas profiles, challenging previous CDM challenges.
Findings
Einstein radii distribution is log-normal with a peak at 1.16
Mass discrepancy between lensing and X-ray is 1.3 on average
Substructure fraction correlates with gas density slope
Abstract
We present a statistical analysis of a sample of 20 strong lensing clusters drawn from the Local Cluster Substructure Survey (LoCuSS), based on high resolution Hubble Space Telescope imaging of the cluster cores and follow-up spectroscopic observations using the Keck-I telescope. We use detailed parameterized models of the mass distribution in the cluster cores, to measure the total cluster mass and fraction of that mass associated with substructures within R<250kpc.These measurements are compared with the distribution of baryons in the cores, as traced by the old stellar populations and the X-ray emitting intracluster medium. Our main results include: (i) the distribution of Einstein radii is log-normal, with a peak and 1sigma width of <log(RE(z=2))>=1.16+/-0.28; (ii) we detect an X-ray/lensing mass discrepancy of <M_SL/M_X>=1.3 at 3 sigma significance -- clusters with larger…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
