A strictly stationary, "causal," 5-tuplewise independent counterexample to the central limit theorem
Richard C. Bradley

TL;DR
This paper constructs a strictly stationary sequence of ±1 random variables with five-tuple independence and causality, which defies the central limit theorem by not converging to a normal distribution, challenging classical probabilistic assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces a novel counterexample sequence that is 5-tuplewise independent, causal, and stationary, yet violates the central limit theorem, expanding understanding of dependence structures.
Findings
Sequence is strictly stationary and 5-tuplewise independent.
Partial sums do not converge to a normal distribution.
Sequence has a trivial double tail sigma-field.
Abstract
A strictly stationary sequence of random variables is constructed with the following properties: (i) the random variables take the values -1 and +1 with probability 1/2 each, (ii) every five of the random variables are independent, (iii) the sequence is "causal" in a certain sense, (iv) the sequence has a trivial double tail sigma-field, and (v) regardless of the normalization used, the partial sums do not converge to a (nondegenerate) normal law. The example has some features in common with a recent construction (for an arbitrary fixed positive integer N), by Alexander Pruss and the author, of a strictly stationary N-tuplewise independent counterexample to the central limit theorem.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsProbability and Risk Models
