Passive decoy state quantum key distribution with practical light sources
Marcos Curty, Xiongfeng Ma, Bing Qi, Tobias Moroder

TL;DR
This paper analyzes passive decoy state quantum key distribution using various practical light sources and detectors, demonstrating its feasibility and robustness in real-world scenarios with noise and finite data effects.
Contribution
It extends previous work by analyzing passive decoy state QKD with diverse light sources and detectors, including effects of noise and finite data fluctuations.
Findings
Passive decoy state QKD is feasible with thermal, phase randomized WCP, and strong coherent sources.
Detection inefficiencies and noise impact the secret key rate but remain manageable.
Finite data size causes statistical fluctuations that can be estimated and mitigated.
Abstract
Decoy states have been proven to be a very useful method for significantly enhancing the performance of quantum key distribution systems with practical light sources. While active modulation of the intensity of the laser pulses is an effective way of preparing decoy states in principle, in practice passive preparation might be desirable in some scenarios. Typical passive schemes involve parametric down-conversion. More recently, it has been shown that phase randomized weak coherent pulses (WCP) can also be used for the same purpose [M. Curty {\it et al.}, Opt. Lett. {\bf 34}, 3238 (2009).] This proposal requires only linear optics together with a simple threshold photon detector, which shows the practical feasibility of the method. Most importantly, the resulting secret key rate is comparable to the one delivered by an active decoy state setup with an infinite number of decoy settings.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
