Clustering Phase Transitions and Hysteresis: Pitfalls in Constructing Network Ensembles
David V. Foster, Jacob G. Foster, Maya Paczuski, and Peter Grassberger

TL;DR
This paper investigates phase transitions and hysteresis in network models that preserve degree sequences while enhancing clustering, revealing pitfalls in using such models as null models for real-world networks due to strong hysteresis effects.
Contribution
The study demonstrates phase transitions and hysteresis in clustering-enhanced network models with fixed degree sequences, highlighting issues in their application as null models.
Findings
Regular graphs with degree k > 2 show a single first order transition.
Non-regular networks exhibit multiple jumps and hysteresis.
Cluster cores emerge as communities, causing modeling pitfalls.
Abstract
Ensembles of networks are used as null models in many applications. However, simple null models often show much less clustering than their real-world counterparts. In this paper, we study a model where clustering is enhanced by means of a fugacity term as in the Strauss (or "triangle") model, but where the degree sequence is strictly preserved -- thus maintaining the quenched heterogeneity of nodes found in the original degree sequence. Similar models had been proposed previously in [R. Milo et al., Science 298, 824 (2002)]. We find that our model exhibits phase transitions as the fugacity is changed. For regular graphs (identical degrees for all nodes) with degree k > 2 we find a single first order transition. For all non-regular networks that we studied (including Erdos - Renyi and scale-free networks) we find multiple jumps resembling first order transitions, together with strong…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
