Comment on "Critique of multinomial coefficient method for evaluating Tsallis and Renyi entropies" by A.S. Parvan
Thomas Oikonomou

TL;DR
This paper refutes Parvan's critique of the generalized multinomial coefficients method for evaluating Tsallis and Renyi entropies, demonstrating that Parvan's arguments are incorrect and that the method's results are valid both mathematically and physically.
Contribution
The paper defends the validity of the GMC approach for entropy evaluation against Parvan's criticisms, clarifying misconceptions in the critique.
Findings
GMC method's results are mathematically consistent
GMC approach aligns with physical principles
Parvan's critique is shown to be incorrect
Abstract
Parvan [arXiv:0911.0383v1] [1] has recently presented some calculations in order to demonstrate the incorrectness of the results obtained from the generalized multinomial coefficients (GMC) presented in Ref. [2]. According to Parvan, the aforementioned approach of studying maximum entropy probability distributions is erroneous. In this comment I demonstrate that Parvan's arguments do not hold true and that the obtained results from GMC do not present either mathematical or physical discrepancies.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Mechanics and Entropy · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis · COVID-19 epidemiological studies
