More common errors in finding exact solutions of nonlinear differential equations. I
Roman O. Popovych, Olena O. Vaneeva

TL;DR
This paper discusses common errors in solving nonlinear differential equations, emphasizing the importance of point transformations and linearizability, and shows that many solutions are essentially transformations of known equations like KdV.
Contribution
It identifies two additional common errors related to similarity and linearizability, and provides a comprehensive classification of variable-coefficient KdV equations to clarify solution methods.
Findings
Exact solutions are often obtainable via point transformations to standard equations.
Group classification helps identify when equations are reducible to known solvable forms.
Many recent solutions are transformations of solutions to standard KdV and mKdV equations.
Abstract
In the recent paper by Kudryashov [Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., 2009, V.14, 3507-3529] seven common errors in finding exact solutions of nonlinear differential equations were listed and discussed in detail. We indicate two more common errors concerning the similarity (equivalence with respect to point transformations) and linearizability of differential equations and then discuss the first of them. Classes of generalized KdV and mKdV equations with variable coefficients are used in order to clarify our conclusions. We investigate admissible point transformations in classes of generalized KdV equations, obtain the necessary and sufficient conditions of similarity of such equations to the standard KdV and mKdV equations and carried out the exhaustive group classification of a class of variable-coefficient KdV equations. Then a number of recent papers on such equations are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
