Is a non-vanishing cosmological constant really needed?
Julio A. Gonzalo

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the observed accelerated expansion of the universe can be explained without a cosmological constant by using open Friedmann-Lemaitre solutions with a time-dependent Hubble parameter and a global flatness condition.
Contribution
It shows that an open universe with zero cosmological constant can account for observed acceleration and flatness, challenging the necessity of dark energy.
Findings
Observed Hubble parameter matches predictions without
Global flatness condition holds at all times
No cosmological constant needed for acceleration
Abstract
Using consistenly the compact Friedmann-Lemaitre solutions for an open universe with zero cosmological constant () we show that the oberved apparent accelerated expansion is compatible with a time dependent Hubble parameter equal to km/s/Mpc at Gys, km/s/Mpc at Gyrs (present), km/s/Mpc at Gyrs and with an apparent global flatness given by at all times which, properly averaged from galaxy formation times to present, gives , , . Therefore, no cosmological constant is needed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena · Relativity and Gravitational Theory
