There was movement that was stationary, for the four-velocity had passed around
Boudewijn F. Roukema (Torun Centre for Astronomy)

TL;DR
This paper questions the validity of the Doppler interpretation of galaxy redshifts within FLRW models when considering non-trivial cosmic topologies, revealing contradictions through holonomy transformations and closed spatial loops.
Contribution
It introduces holonomy transformations for FLRW models with different curvatures and links cosmic topology to redshift interpretation issues.
Findings
Doppler interpretation leads to contradictions in multiply-connected FLRW models.
Inertial observers appear to recede from themselves at non-zero speeds.
Contradictions occur for all redshifts in flat and spherical cases, and large redshifts in hyperbolic cases.
Abstract
Is the Doppler interpretation of galaxy redshifts in a Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) model valid in the context of the approach to comoving spatial sections pioneered by de Sitter, Friedmann, Lemaitre and Robertson, i.e. according to which the 3-manifold of comoving space is characterised by both its curvature and topology? Holonomy transformations for flat, spherical and hyperbolic FLRW spatial sections are proposed. By quotienting a simply-connected FLRW spatial section by an appropriate group of holonomy transformations, the Doppler interpretation in a non-expanding Minkowski space-time, obtained via four-velocity parallel transport along a photon path, is found to imply that an inertial observer is receding from herself at a speed greater than zero, implying contradictory world-lines. The contradiction in the multiply-connected case occurs for arbitrary redshifts in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
