The Morphology of Passively Evolving Galaxies at z ~ 2 from HST/WFC3 Deep Imaging in the Hubble Ultradeep Field
P. Cassata, M. Giavalisco, Yicheng Guo, H. Ferguson, A. Koekemoer, A., Renzini, A. Fontana, S. Salimbeni, M. Dickinson, S. Casertano, C. J., Conselice, N. Grogin, J. M. Lotz, C. Papovich, R. A. Lucas, A. Straughn, J., P. Gardner, L. Moustakas

TL;DR
This study uses deep HST/WFC3 imaging to analyze the morphology of six passive, massive galaxies at z~2, revealing compact sizes, regular profiles, and minimal wavelength-dependent morphological differences, advancing understanding of early galaxy evolution.
Contribution
First detailed near-IR morphological analysis of passive galaxies at z~2 showing their compactness and structural similarity across wavelengths.
Findings
Galaxies have small effective radii (~1 kpc), much smaller than local counterparts.
Light profiles are well described by Sersic models with indices typical of spheroids.
Minimal morphological change between UV and optical wavelengths.
Abstract
We present near-IR images, obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and the WFC3/IR camera, of six passive and massive galaxies at redshift 1.3<z<2.4 (SSFR<10^{-2} Gyr^{-1}; stellar mass M~10^{11} M_{sun}), selected from the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS). These images, which have a spatial resolution of ~1.5 kpc, provide the deepest view of the optical rest-frame morphology of such systems to date. We find that the light profile of these galaxies is regular and well described by a Sersic model with index typical of today's spheroids. Their size, however, is generally much smaller than today's early types of similar stellar mass, with four out of six galaxies having r_e ~ 1 kpc or less, in quantitative agreement with previous similar measures made at rest-frame UV wavelengths. The images reach limiting surface brightness mu~26.5 mag arcsec^{-2} in the F160W…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
