Constraining the energy-momentum dispersion relation with Planck-scale sensitivity using cold atoms
Giovanni Amelino-Camelia, Claus Laemmerzahl, Flavio Mercati, Guglielmo, M. Tino

TL;DR
This paper uses ultra-precise cold-atom experiments to set new constraints on possible modifications of the energy-momentum dispersion relation at near-Planck-scale sensitivity, providing laboratory-based limits on quantum gravity effects.
Contribution
It introduces a novel laboratory approach to constrain the dispersion relation modifications at Planck-scale sensitivity using cold-atom recoil experiments.
Findings
Set a limit within an order of magnitude of the Planck scale for the leading correction.
Provided the best laboratory limits on Lorentz-symmetry deformation theories.
Achieved a sensitivity level comparable to astrophysical observations in a controlled setting.
Abstract
We use the results of ultra-precise cold-atom-recoil experiments to constrain the form of the energy-momentum dispersion relation, a structure that is expected to be modified in several quantum-gravity approaches. Our strategy of analysis applies to the nonrelativistic (small speeds) limit of the dispersion relation, and is therefore complementary to an analogous ongoing effort of investigation of the dispersion relation in the ultrarelativistic regime using observations in astrophysics. For the leading correction in the nonrelativistic limit the exceptional sensitivity of cold-atom-recoil experiments remarkably allows us to set a limit within a single order of magnitude of the desired Planck-scale level, thereby providing the first example of Planck-scale sensitivity in the study of the dispersion relation in controlled laboratory experiments. For the next-to-leading term we obtain a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
