Development of a GEM-TPC prototype
Heinz Angerer, Reinhard Beck, Martin Berger, Felix Boehmer, K. -T., Brinkmann, Paul Buehler, Michael Carnegie, Sverre Dorheim, Laura Fabbietti,, Chr. Funke, F. Cusanno, Joerg Hehner, Andreas Heinz, Markus Henske, Christian, Hoeppner, David Kaiser, Bernhard Ketzer, Igor Konorov

TL;DR
This paper reports the development and testing of a GEM-based TPC prototype designed for continuous operation in high-energy physics experiments, aiming to improve spatial resolution and vertex reconstruction capabilities.
Contribution
It introduces a novel GEM-TPC prototype that eliminates gating, enabling continuous operation and testing under realistic experimental conditions.
Findings
Prototype successfully tested with carbon and lithium beams.
Spatial resolution and vertex reconstruction capabilities verified.
Potential for integration into the PANDA central tracker demonstrated.
Abstract
The use of GEM foils for the amplification stage of a TPC instead of a con- ventional MWPC allows one to bypass the necessity of gating, as the backdrift is suppressed thanks to the asymmetric field configuration. This way, a novel continuously running TPC, which represents one option for the PANDA central tracker, can be realized. A medium sized prototype with a diameter of 300 mm and a length of 600 mm will be tested inside the FOPI spectrometer at GSI using a carbon or lithium beam at intermediate energies (E = 1-3AGeV). This detector test under realistic experimental conditions should allow us to verify the spatial resolution for single tracks and the reconstruction capability for displaced vertexes. A series of physics measurement implying pion beams is scheduled with the FOPI spectrometer together with the GEM-TPC as well.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
