Bayesian analysis of an anisotropic universe model: systematics and polarization
Nicolaas E. Groeneboom, Lotty Ackerman, Ingunn Kathrine Wehus, Hans, Kristian Eriksen

TL;DR
This paper revisits the anisotropic universe model, incorporating polarization and systematics, and finds that the detected anisotropy in WMAP data is likely due to systematic effects rather than cosmological origin.
Contribution
The authors extend the ACW anisotropic model to include polarization and systematics, reanalyze WMAP data, and identify potential non-cosmological origins of the anisotropy signal.
Findings
No significant impact of asymmetric beams or noise mis-estimation.
Detection of a preferred direction aligned with the solar system plane.
Signal likely caused by systematic effects, not cosmological.
Abstract
We revisit the anisotropic universe model previously developed by Ackerman, Carroll and Wise (ACW), and generalize both the theoretical and computational framework to include polarization and various forms of systematic effects. We apply our new tools to simulated WMAP data in order to understand the potential impact of asymmetric beams, noise mis-estimation and potential Zodiacal light emission. We find that neither has any significant impact on the results. We next show that the previously reported ACW signal is also present in the 1-year WMAP temperature sky map presented by Liu & Li, where data cuts are more aggressive. Finally, we reanalyze the 5-year WMAP data taking into account a previously neglected (-i)^{l-l'}-term in the signal covariance matrix. We still find a strong detection of a preferred direction in the temperature map. Including multipoles up to l=400, the anisotropy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
