P-spaces and the Whyburn property
Angelo Bella, Camillo Costantini, Santi Spadaro

TL;DR
This paper explores the properties of P-spaces related to the Whyburn property, constructing examples and analyzing how these properties behave under set-theoretic assumptions and products.
Contribution
It provides the first examples of non-weakly Whyburn P-spaces of size continuum and examines the influence of set-theoretic hypotheses on these spaces.
Findings
Existence of non-weakly Whyburn P-spaces of size continuum under CH.
Weak Kurepa Hypothesis implies non-weakly Whyburn P-spaces of size .
Product of Lindel4f weakly Whyburn and Whyburn P-spaces is weakly Whyburn.
Abstract
We investigate the Whyburn and weakly Whyburn property in the class of -spaces, that is spaces where every countable intersection of open sets is open. We construct examples of non-weakly Whyburn -spaces of size continuum, thus giving a negative answer under CH to a question of Pelant, Tkachenko, Tkachuk and Wilson. In addition, we show that the weak Kurepa Hypothesis (a set-theoretic assumption weaker than CH) implies the existence of a non-weakly Whyburn -space of size . Finally, we consider the behavior of the above-mentioned properties under products; we show in particular that the product of a Lindel\"of weakly Whyburn P-space and a Lindel\"of Whyburn -space is weakly Whyburn, and we give a consistent example of a non-Whyburn product of two Lindel\"of Whyburn -spaces.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory
