Comparison between the Luminosity functions of X-ray and [OIII] selected AGN
I. Georgantopoulos (1), A. Akylas (1) ((1) National Observatory of, Athens)

TL;DR
This study compares the luminosity functions of X-ray and [OIII] selected AGN, finding that both methods are similarly effective in detecting powerful AGN, with optical selection capturing more low-luminosity Seyferts.
Contribution
It constructs and compares predicted and observed X-ray luminosity functions for Seyfert galaxies using combined optical and X-ray data, clarifying selection biases.
Findings
Optical and X-ray luminosity functions show reasonable agreement in common luminosity ranges.
Optical selection probes less luminous Seyferts than X-ray surveys.
No evidence that [OIII] selection is more robust than X-ray in detecting powerful AGN.
Abstract
We investigate claims according to which the X-ray selection of AGN is not as efficient compared to that based on [OIII] selection because of the effects of X-ray absorption.We construct the predicted X-ray luminosity function both for all Seyferts as well as separately for Seyfert-1 and Seyfert-2 type galaxies, by combining the optical AGN [OIII] luminosity functions derived in SDSS with the corresponding L_X-L_[OIII] relations. These relations are derived from XMM-Newton observations of all Seyfert galaxies in the Palomar spectroscopic sample of nearby galaxies after correction for X-ray absorption and optical reddening. We compare the predicted X-ray luminosity functions with those actually observed in the local Universe by HEAO-1, RXTE as well as INTEGRAL. The last luminosity function is derived in the 17-60 keV region and thus is not affected by absorption even in the case of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
