Observational constraints on the co-evolution of supermassive black holes and galaxies
X. Z. Zheng (1), E. F. Bell (2,3), R. S. Somerville (2,4), H.-W. Rix, (2), K. Jahnke (2), F. Fontanot (2,5), G. H. Rieke (6), D. Schiminovich (7),, K. Meisenheimer (2) ((1) Purple Mountain Observatory, (2) Max-Planck Institue, for Astronomy, (3) University of Michigan

TL;DR
This study investigates the relationship between star formation and black hole activity in galaxies, revealing that they mostly occur in different events, challenging the idea of their simple co-evolution, and highlighting the role of galaxy structure.
Contribution
It provides observational evidence that star formation and black hole accretion are offset in time and occur in different galaxy events, refining models of galaxy and black hole co-evolution.
Findings
Less than 25% of star formation occurs in spheroid-dominated galaxies.
Expected black hole accretion rates are three times higher than observed in these galaxies.
Major star formation and black hole activity happen in different events, not simultaneously.
Abstract
The star formation rate (SFR) and black hole accretion rate (BHAR) functions are measured to be proportional to each other at z < ~3. This close correspondence between SF and BHA would naturally yield a BH mass-galaxy mass correlation, whereas a BH mass-bulge mass correlation is observed. To explore this apparent contradiction we study the SF in spheroid-dominated galaxies between z=1 and the present day. We use 903 galaxies from the COMBO-17 survey with M* >2x10^10M_sun, ultraviolet and infrared-derived SFRs from Spitzer and GALEX, and morphologies from GEMS HST/ACS imaging. Using stacking techniques, we find that <25% of all SF occurs in spheroid-dominated galaxies (Sersic index n>2.5), while the BHAR that we would expect if the global scalings held is three times higher. This rules out the simplest picture of co-evolution, in which SF and BHA trace each other at all times. These…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
