Scaling of human body mass with height: the Body Mass Index revisited
N. J. Mackay

TL;DR
This paper revisits the scaling laws of human body mass and waist circumference with height, using biomechanical and physiological arguments, and supports the findings with data from children in Hong Kong and Britain.
Contribution
It introduces a biomechanical framework to derive specific scaling exponents for body mass and waist circumference relative to height, refining previous models.
Findings
Body mass scales as approximately h^{8/3} in children.
Waist circumference scales as roughly h^{q} with q near 2/3.
Empirical data from children support the proposed scaling laws.
Abstract
We adapt a biomechanical argument of Rashevsky, which places limits on the stress experienced by a torso supported by the legs, to deduce that body mass of growing children should scale as the th power of height with . Further arguments based on stability and heat loss suggest that should be close to 8/3. The arguments are extended to suggest that waist circumference should scale as with near the lower end of . Data from Hong Kong and British children are consistent with these hypotheses.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBody Composition Measurement Techniques · Adipose Tissue and Metabolism · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
