Diophantine properties of IETs and general systems: Quantitative proximality and connectivity
Michael Boshernitzan, Jon Chaika

TL;DR
This paper investigates the Diophantine properties of interval exchange transformations (IETs), establishing new results on their proximality and connectivity, including optimal shrinking target results for ergodic IETs and contrasting behaviors for 3-IETs.
Contribution
The paper provides new quantitative results on the proximality of ergodic IETs, proves optimality of certain bounds, and shows that no 3-IET is strongly topologically mixing.
Findings
Ergodic IETs satisfy 1 with optimal rate n.
Almost all 3-IETs exhibit divergence in 2 for ps>0.
No 3-IET is strongly topologically mixing.
Abstract
We present shrinking targets results for general systems with the emphasis on applications for IETs (interval exchange transformations) , . In particular, we prove that if an IET is ergodic (relative to the Lebesgue measure ), then the equality \[ \liminf_{n\to\infty}\limits n |T^n(x)-y|=0 \tag{A1} \] holds for -a. a. . The ergodicity assumption is essential: the result does not extend to all minimal IETs. The factor in (A1) is optimal (e. g., it cannot be replaced by . On the other hand, for Lebesgue almost all 3-IETs we prove that for all \[ \liminf_{n\to\infty}\limits n^\eps |T^n(x)-T^n(y)|= \infty,\quad \text{for Lebesgue a. a.} (x,y)\in J^2. \tag{A2} \] This should be contrasted with the equality for a. a. , which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
