Fluctuation dynamo based on magnetic reconnections
Andrew W. Baggaley, Carlo F. Barenghi, Anvar Shukurov, Kandaswamy, Subramanian

TL;DR
This paper introduces a flux rope-based fluctuation dynamo model driven by turbulence, emphasizing magnetic reconnections as the primary dissipation mechanism, and explores its efficiency and saturation behavior in plasma environments.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel flux rope dynamo model with reconnection-driven dissipation, applicable to rarefied plasmas, and analyzes its efficiency, energy release distribution, and nonlinear saturation mechanisms.
Findings
Flux rope dynamo is over ten times more efficient at converting energy into heat.
Magnetic energy release during reconnections follows a power-law distribution with slope -3.
A saturation mechanism involves suppression of turbulent magnetic diffusivity due to flux ropes.
Abstract
We develop a new model of the fluctuation dynamo in which the magnetic field is confined to thin flux ropes advected by a multi-scale flow which models turbulence. Magnetic dissipation occurs only via reconnections of flux ropes. The model is particularly suitable for rarefied plasma, such as the Solar corona or galactic halos. We investigate the kinetic energy release into heat, mediated by dynamo action, both in our model and by solving the induction equation with the same flow. We find that the flux rope dynamo is more than an order of magnitude more efficient at converting mechanical energy into heat. The probability density of the magnetic energy released during reconnections has a power-law form with the slope -3, consistent with the Solar corona heating by nanoflares. We also present a nonlinear extension of the model. This shows that a plausible saturation mechanism of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
