Exploring the Luminosity Evolution and Stellar Mass Assembly of 2SLAQ Luminous Red Galaxies Between Redshift 0.4 and 0.8
Manda Banerji (IoA, Cambridge/UCL), Ignacio Ferreras (MSSL-UCL),, Filipe B. Abdalla (UCL), Paul Hewett (IoA, Cambridge), Ofer Lahav (UCL)

TL;DR
This study analyzes the evolution of luminous red galaxies between redshifts 0.4 and 0.8, finding that massive galaxies' stellar mass assembly was largely complete by z ~ 0.8, supporting early formation and downsizing scenarios.
Contribution
It provides new observational evidence on the passive evolution and early mass assembly of massive galaxies, challenging current galaxy formation models.
Findings
Massive LRGs evolve passively with little stellar mass growth after z ~ 0.8.
Stellar mass assembly of these galaxies was largely complete by z ~ 0.8.
Results support early formation and downsizing in galaxy evolution.
Abstract
We present an analysis of the evolution of 8625 Luminous Red Galaxies between z = 0.4 and z = 0.8 in the 2dF and SDSS LRG and QSO (2SLAQ) survey. The LRGs are split into redshift bins and the evolution of both the luminosity and stellar mass function with redshift is considered and compared to the assumptions of a passive evolution scenario. We draw attention to several sources of systematic error that could bias the evolutionary predictions made in this paper. While the inferred evolution is found to be relatively unaffected by the exact choice of spectral evolution model used to compute K+e corrections, we conclude that photometric errors could be a source of significant bias in colour-selected samples such as this, in particular when using parametric maximum likelihood based estimators. We find that the evolution of the most massive LRGs is consistent with the assumptions of passive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
