Looking for the first galaxies: Lensing or blank fields?
A. Maizy (LATT), J. Richard (Durham), M. A. De Leo (UNAM), R. Pello, (LATT), J. P. Kneib (LAM)

TL;DR
This study compares the efficiency of lensing versus blank fields in detecting high-redshift galaxies, finding lensing clusters significantly enhance detection rates, especially at fainter magnitudes and higher redshifts.
Contribution
It provides a detailed simulation-based analysis of the relative effectiveness of lensing and blank fields for high-z galaxy surveys, guiding optimal observing strategies.
Findings
Lensing clusters increase detection of high-z galaxies, especially at faint magnitudes.
Positive magnification bias is stronger at higher redshifts and shallower surveys.
Lensing is more efficient for exploring the faint end of the luminosity function at z>6.
Abstract
The identification and study of the first galaxies remains one of the most exciting topics in observational cosmology. The determination of the best possible observing strategies is a very important choice in order to build up a representative sample of spectroscopically confirmed sources at high-z (z>7), beyond the limits of present-day observations. This paper is intended to precisely adress the relative efficiency of lensing and blank fields in the identification and study of galaxies at 6<z<12. The detection efficiency and field-to-field variance are estimated from direct simulations of both blank and lensing fields observations. The presence of a strong-lensing cluster along the line of sight has a dramatic effect on the number of observed sources, with a positive magnification bias in typical ground-based ``shallow'' surveys (AB<~25.5). The positive magnification bias increases…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
