Comments on a paper by B.Schulz about Bell's inequalities
I. Schmelzer

TL;DR
This paper critiques Schulz's claim of a local stochastic theory violating Bell's inequality, asserting that Schulz's claim is incorrect and providing a counter-argument.
Contribution
It clarifies the misconception about Bell's inequalities and refutes Schulz's claim of a local stochastic violation.
Findings
Schulz's theory does not violate Bell's inequality.
Bell's inequalities remain valid under local stochastic theories.
The paper corrects misconceptions about locality and Bell's theorem.
Abstract
Schulz claims to have constructed an actively local stochastic theory which violates Bell's inequality. This is false.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
